Paper detail

On the number of connected components of random algebraic hypersurfaces

We study the expectation of the number of components $b_0(X)$ of a random algebraic hypersurface $X$ defined by the zero set in projective space $\mathbb{R}P^n$ of a random homogeneous polynomial $f$ of degree $d$. Specifically, we consider "invariant ensembles", that is Gaussian ensembles of polynomials that are invariant under an orthogonal change of variables. The classification due to E. Kostlan shows that specifying an invariant ensemble is equivalent to assigning a weight to each eigenspace of the spherical Laplacian. Fixing $n$, we consider a family of invariant ensembles (choice of eigenspace weights) depending on the degree $d$. Under a rescaling assumption on the eigenspace weights (as $d \rightarrow \infty$), we prove that the order of growth of $\mathbb{E} b_0(X)$ satisfies: $$\mathbb{E} b_{0}(X)=Θ\left(\left[ \mathbb{E} b_0(X\cap \mathbb{R}P^1) \right]^{n} \right). $$ This relates the average number of components of $X$ to the classical problem of M. Kac (1943) on the number of zeros of the random univariate polynomial $f|_{\mathbb{R}P^1}.$ The proof requires an upper bound for $\mathbb{E} b_0(X)$, which we obtain by counting extrema using Random Matrix Theory methods from recent work of the first author, and it also requires a lower bound, which we obtain by a modification of the barrier method. We also provide a quantitative upper bound for the implied constant in the above asymptotic; for the real Fubini-Study model these estimates reveal super-exponential decay of the leading coefficient (in $d$) of $\mathbb{E} b_0(X)$ (as $n \rightarrow \infty$).

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.