Paper detail

On the number of alternating paths in random graphs

In the noisy channel model from coding theory, we wish to detect errors introduced during transmission by optimizing various parameters of the code. Bennett, Dudek, and LaForge framed a variation of this problem in the language of alternating paths in edge-colored complete bipartite graphs in 2016. Here, we extend this problem to the random graph $\mathbb{G}(n,p)$. We seek the alternating connectivity, $κ_{r,\ell}(G)$, which is the maximum $t$ such that there is an $r$-edge-coloring of $G$ such that any pair of vertices is connected by $t$ internally disjoint and alternating (i.e. no consecutive edges of the same color) paths of length $\ell$. We have three main results about how this parameter behaves in $\mathbb{G}(n,p)$ that basically cover all ranges of $p$: one for paths of length two, one for the dense case, and one for the sparse case. For paths of length two, we found that $κ_{r,\ell}(G)$ is essentially the codegree of a pair of vertices. For the dense case when $p$ is constant, we were able to achieve the natural upper bounds of minimum degree (minus some intersection) or the total number of disjoint paths between a pair of vertices. For the sparse case, we were able to find colorings that achieved the natural obstructions of minimum degree or (in a slightly less precise result) the total number of paths of a certain length in a graph. We broke up this sparse case into ranges of $p$ corresponding to when $\mathbb{G}(n,p)$ has diameter $k$ or $k+1$. We close with some remarks about a similar parameter and a generalization to pseudorandom graphs.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.