On the nonexistence of [(2mm−1),2m,(2m−1m−1)][\binom{2m}{m-1}, 2m, \binom{2m-1}{m-1}], mm odd, complex orthogonal design

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Abstract

Complex orthogonal designs (CODs) are used to construct space-time block codes. COD Oz\mathcal{O}_z with parameter [p,n,k][p, n, k] is a p×np\times n matrix, where nonzero entries are filled by ±zi\pm z_i or ±zi∗\pm z^*_i, i=1,2,...,ki = 1, 2,..., k, such that OzHOz=(∣z1∣2+∣z2∣2+...+∣zk∣2)In×n\mathcal{O}^H_z \mathcal{O}_z = (|z_1|^2+|z_2|^2+...+|z_k|^2)I_{n \times n}. Adams et al. in "The final case of the decoding delay problem for maximum rate complex orthogonal designs," IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 103-122, Jan. 2010, first proved the nonexistence of [(2mm−1),2m,(2m−1m−1)][\binom{2m}{m-1}, 2m, \binom{2m-1}{m-1}], mm odd, COD. Combining with the previous result that decoding delay should be an integer multiple of (2mm−1)\binom{2m}{m-1}, they solved the final case n≡2(mod4)n \equiv 2 \pmod 4 of the decoding delay problem for maximum rate complex orthogonal designs. In this paper, we give another proof of the nonexistence of COD with parameter [(2mm−1),2m,(2m−1m−1)][\binom{2m}{m-1}, 2m, \binom{2m-1}{m-1}], mm odd. Our new proof is based on the uniqueness of [(2mm−1),2m−1,(2m−1m−1)][\binom{2m}{m-1}, 2m-1, \binom{2m-1}{m-1}] under equivalence operation, where an explicit-form representation is proposed to help the proof. Then, by proving it's impossible to add an extra orthogonal column on COD [(2mm−1),2m−1,(2m−1m−1)][\binom{2m}{m-1}, 2m-1, \binom{2m-1}{m-1}] when mm is odd, we complete the proof of the nonexistence of COD [(2mm−1),2m,(2m−1m−1)][\binom{2m}{m-1}, 2m, \binom{2m-1}{m-1}].

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.