Paper detail

On the Non-uniform Distribution of the Angular Elements of Near-Earth Objects

We examine the angular distributions of near-Earth objects (NEOs) which are often regarded as uniform. The apparent distribution of the longitude of ascending node, $Ω$, is strongly affected by well-known seasonal effects in the discovery rate of NEOs. The deviation from the expected $π$-periodicity in the apparent distribution of $Ω$ indicates that its intrinsic distribution is slightly enhanced along a mean direction, $\barΩ=111^\circ$; approximately 53% of NEOs have $Ω$ values within $\pm90^\circ$ of $\barΩ$. We also find that each sub-group of NEOs (Amors, Apollos and Atens) has different observational selection effects which cause different non-uniformities in the apparent distributions of their arguments of perihelion $ω$, and longitudes of perihelion $\varpi$. For their intrinsic distributions, our analysis reveals that the Apollo asteroids have non-uniform $ω$ due to secular dynamics associated with inclination-eccentricity-$ω$ coupling, and the Amors' $\varpi$ distribution is peaked towards the secularly forced eccentricity vector. The Apollos' $ω$ distribution is axial, favoring values near 0 and $180^\circ$; the two quadrants centered at 0 and $180^\circ$ account for 55% of the Apollos' $ω$ values. The Amors' $\varpi$ distribution peaks near $\bar\varpi=4^\circ$; sixty-one percent of Amors have $\varpi$ within $\pm90^\circ$ of this peak. We show that these modest but statistically significant deviations from uniform random distributions of angular elements are owed to planetary perturbations, primarily Jupiter's. It is remarkable that this strongly chaotic population of minor planets reveals the presence of Jupiter in its angular distributions.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.