Paper detail

On the neutrino non-detection of GRB 130427A

The recent gamma-ray burst GRB 130427A has an isotropic electromagnetic energy $E^{iso}\sim10^{54}$ erg, suggesting an ample supply of target photons for photo-hadronic interactions, which at its low redshift of $z\sim0.34$ would appear to make it a promising candidate for neutrino detection. However, the IceCube collaboration has reported a null result based on a search during the prompt emission phase. We show that this neutrino non-detection can provide valuable information about this GRB's key physical parameters such as the emission radius $R_{d}$, the bulk Lorentz factor $Γ$ and the energy fraction converted into cosmic rays $ε_{p}$. The results are discussed both in a model-independent way and in the specific scenarios of an internal shock model (IS), a baryonic photospheric model (BPH) and magnetic photospheric model (MPH). We find that the constraints are most stringent for the magnetic photospheric model considered, but the constraints on the internal shock and the baryonic photosphere models are fairly modest.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.