Paper detail

On the network orientational affinity assumption in polymers and the micro-macro connection through the chain stretch

We question the network affinity assumption in modeling chain orientations under polymer deformations, and the use of the stretch measure projected from the right Cauchy-Green deformation tensor (or non-affine micro-stretches derived from that measure) as a basic state variable for the micro-macro transition. These ingredients are standard, taken from the statistical theory of polymers, and used in most micromechanical polymer network and soft tissue models. The affinity assumption imposes a constraint in the network which results in an anisotropic distribution of the orientation of the chains and, hence, in an additional configurational entropy that should be included. This additional entropy would result in an additional stress tensor. But an arguably more natural alternative, in line with the typical assumption for the chain behavior itself and with the disregard of these forces, is to consider that the network may fluctuate unconstrained to adapt to macroscopic deformations. This way, the isotropic statistical distribution of the orientation of the chains is maintained unconstrained during deformation and no additional stress is imposed. Then, we show that this free-fluctuating network assumption is equivalent to consider the stretch projected from the stretch tensor (instead of the right Cauchy-Green deformation tensor) as the state variable for the deformation of the network chains. We show very important differences in predictions using both assumed behaviors, and demonstrate that with the free-fluctuating network assumption, we can obtain accurate predictions for all tests in polymers using just one test curve to calibrate the model. With the same macro-micro-macro approach employing the network affinity assumption, we are capable of capturing accurately only the test used for calibration of the model, but not the overall polymer behavior.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.