Paper detail

On the Nature of the Progenitor of the Type Ia SN2011fe in M101

The explosion of a Type Ia supernova, SN 2011ef, in the nearby Pinwheel galaxy (M101 at 6.4 Mpc) provides an opportunity to study pre-explosion images and search for the progenitor, which should consist of a white dwarf (WD), possibly surrounded by an accretion disk, in orbit with another star. We report on our use of deep Chandra observations to limit the luminosity and temperature of the pre-explosion white dwarf (WD). It is found that if the spectrum was a blackbody, then WDs of highest possible temperatures and luminosities are excluded but, even if the WD was emitting at the Eddington luminosity, values of kT less than roughly 60 eV are permitted. This allows the progenitor to be an accreting nuclear-burning WD with an expanded photosphere. Pre-SN HST observations were used to derive a lower limit of about 10 eV for the expanded photosphere. Li et al.\, (2011) have already ruled out the possibility of a giant donor. We consider the combined emission from the WD, disk, and donor, and find that even the combined emission from a bright subgiant, WD and disk would not likely have been observed prior to explosion, and neither would some local candidates for the nuclear-burning WD model.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.