Paper detail

On the nature of SW Sex

We present spectrophotometry of the eclipsing nova-like variable SW Sex. The continuum is deeply eclipsed and shows asymmetries due to the presence of a bright spot. We derive a new ephemeris and, by measuring the eclipse width, we are able to constrain the inclination to i > 75^o and the disc radius to R_D > 0.6 L_1. In common with other members of its class (of which it is the proto-type), SW Sex shows single-peaked emission lines which show transient absorption features and large phase shifts in their radial velocity curves. In addition, the light curves of the emission lines show a reduction in flux around phase 0.5 and asymmetric eclipse profiles which are not as deep as the continuum eclipse. Using Doppler tomography, we find that most of the line emission in SW Sex appears to originate from three sources: the secondary star, the accretion disc and an extended bright spot. The detection of the red star allows us to constrain the radial-velocity semi-amplitude of the secondary to K_R > 180 km/s and hence the component masses to M_1 = 0.3-0.7 Msun and M_2 < 0.3 Msun.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.