Paper detail

On the nature of radio-wave radiation from particle cascades

The nature of the radio-wave radiation generated by particle cascades in both the Earth's atmosphere and dense media such as ice has, historically, been much debated. This situation changed in the early 2010's, with the community converging on the common terminology of "geomagnetic" and "Askaryan" radiation to describe the two emission mechanisms. However, this convergence arose from discussions at various conferences and workshops, and was ultimately reached through agreement between simulation codes and experimental measurements. In this article therefore, I use relatively simple geometrical arguments, and a minimum of calculations based on single particle tracks, to explain the nature of radiation from extensive air showers (EAS) and cascades in dense media such as ice. I identify well-determined frequency regimes where the radiation from the Askaryan effect will be bremsstrahlung-like and Cherenkov-like, being respectively below/above 1 GHz in EAS and 100 MHz in dense media; and where geomagnetic emission will be transverse-current-like and where it will resemble synchrotron radiation, respectively below/above a few GHz in EAS, depending on the height of cascade development. I suggest how these transitions in the nature of the emission may be experimentally observed.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.