Paper detail

On the nature of candidate luminous blue variables in M33

Luminous blue variables (LBVs) are expected to play an important role in massive stellar evolution as well as being the progenitors of some of the most luminous supernovae known. In this paper we provide a multiwavelength study of the population of (candidate) LBVs identified within M33. New spectra provide an observational baseline of >4yr with respect to published data, which is well suited to identifying LBV outbursts. Multi-epoch optical and mid-IR surveys of M33 further constrain the variability of the sample and permit a search for dusty circumstellar ejecta. Spectroscopic and photometric variability appears common amongst the sample, although in many cases further observations will be required to determine its physical origin. Nevertheless, we report a new outburst of M33 Var C, while the transition of the WNLh star B517 to a cooler B supergiant phase between 1993-2010 confirms an LBV classification. Proof-of-concept quantitative analysis is provided for Romano's star; the results being consistent with the finding that its bolometric luminosity varies during its LBV excursions. The combination of the temperature and luminosity of two stars, the B hypergiant [HS80] 110A and the cool hypergiant B324, appears to be in violation of the empirical Humphreys-Davidson limit. Mid-IR observations demonstrate that a number of candidates appear associated with hot circumstellar dust, although no objects as extreme as Eta Carinae are identified. The combined multiwavelength dataset suggests that the population of LBVs studied is contaminated by stars demonstrating the B[e] phenomenon. Of these, a subset of optically faint, low luminosity stars associated with hot dust are of particular interest since they appear similar to the likely progenitors of SN 2008S and the 2008 NGC300 transient, albeit suffering less intrinsic extinction. [ABRIDGED]

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.