Paper detail

On the nature of bulges in general and of box/peanut bulges in particular. Input from $N$-body simulations

Objects designated as bulges in disc galaxies do not form a homogeneous class. I distinguish three types. The classical bulges, whose properties are similar to those of ellipticals and which form by collapse or merging. Boxy and peanut bulges, which are seen in near edge-on galaxies and which are in fact just a part of the bar seen edge-on. Finally disc-like bulges, which result from the inflow of (mainly) gas to the center-most parts, and subsequent star formation. I make a detailed comparison of the properties of boxy and peanut bulges with those of $N$-body bars seen edge-on and answer previously voiced objections about the links between the two. I also present and analyse simulations where a boxy /peanut feature is present at the same time as a classical spheroidal bulge and compare them with observations. Finally, I propose a nomenclature that can help distinguish between the three types of bulges and avoid considerable confusion.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.