Paper detail

On the multiplicity of supernovae within host galaxies

We investigate the nature of multiple supernova hosting galaxies, and the types of events which they produce. Using all known historical supernovae, we split host galaxies into samples containing single or multiple events. These samples are then characterised in terms of their relative supernova fractions, and host properties. In multiple supernova hosts the ratio of type Ia to core-collapse events is lower than in single supernova hosts. For core-collapse events there is a suggestion that the ratio of types Ibc to type II events is higher in multiples than within single supernova hosts. This second increase is dominated by an increase in the number of SNIb. Within multiple supernova hosts, supernovae of any given type appear to 'prefer' to explode in galaxies that are host to the same type of SN. We also find that multiple SN hosts have higher T-type morphologies. While our results suffer from low number statistics, we speculate that their simplest interpretation is that star formation within galaxies is generally of an episodic and bursty nature. This leads to the supernovae detected within any particular galaxy to be dominated by those with progenitors of a specific age, rather than a random selection from standard relative supernova rates, as the latter would be expected if star formation was of a long-term continuous nature. We further discuss the supernova progenitor and star formation properties that may be important for understanding these trends, and also comment on a range of important selection effects within our sample.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.