Paper detail

On the most luminous planetary nebulae of M31

To study the progenitors of PNe at the tip of the Planetary Nebula Luminosity Function (PNLF), we obtained the deepest existing spectra of a sample of PNe in the galaxy M31. Precise chemical abundances allow us to confront the theoretical yields for Asymptotic Giant Branch (AGB) stellar masses and metallicities expected at the bright end of the PNLF. Central star masses of the sampled PNe provide direct information on the controversial origin of the universal cutoff of the PNLF. Using the 10.4m Gran Telescopio Canarias (GTC) optical spectra of nine bright M31 PNe were obtained: four of them at the tip of the PNLF, and the other five some 0.5 magnitudes fainter. A control sample of 21 PNe with previous GTC spectra from literature is also included. Their physical properties and chemical abundances (He, N, O, Ar, Ne and S) are analysed. The central star masses are estimated with Cloudy modelling using the most recent evolutionary tracks. The studied PNe show a remarkable uniformity in all their nebular properties, the brightest PNe showing relatively large electron densities. Stellar characteristics also span a narrow range: ${<L_{*}/L_{\odot}> = 4300 \pm 310, <Teff> = 122000 \pm 10600 K}$ for the central stars of the four brightest PNe, and ${<L_{*}/L_{\odot}> = 3300 \pm 370, < Teff> = 135000 \pm 26000 K}$ for those in the control set. This groups all the brightest PNe at the location of maximum temperature in the post-AGB tracks for stars with initial masses ${M = 1.5 M_{\odot}}$. These figures provide robust observational constraints about the stellar progenitors producing the PNLF cutoff in a star-forming galaxy such as M31, where a large range of initial masses is in principle available. Inconsistency is found, however, in the computed N/O abundance ratios of five nebulae, which are 1.5 to 3 times larger than predicted by the existing models for stars of these masses.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.