Paper detail

On the molecular gas content and SFR in Hickson Compact Groups: enhanced or deficient?

We study the effect of the extreme environment in Hickson Compact groups (HCGs) on the molecular gas mass, \mhtwo, and the star formation rate (SFR) of galaxies as a function of atomic hydrogen (HI) content and evolutionary phase of the group. We have selected a redshift limited (D$<$100 Mpc) sample of 88 galaxies in 20 HCGs with available atomic hydrogen (HI) VLA maps, covering a wide range of HI deficiencies and evolutionary phases of the groups, and containing at least one spiral galaxy. We derived the far-infrared (FIR) luminosity (\lfir) from IRAS data and used it as a tracer of the SFR. We calculated the HI mass, \lfir and \mhtwo deficiencies. The mean deficiencies of \lfir and \mhtwo of spiral galaxies in HCGs are close to 0, indicating that their average SFR and molecular gas content are similar to those of isolated galaxies. However, there are indications of an excess in \mhtwo\($\sim$ 50%) in spiral galaxies in HCGs which can be interpreted as either an enhanced molecular gas content or as a higher concentration of \mhtwo towards the center in comparison to galaxies in lower density environments. In contrast, the mean \mhi of spiral galaxies in HCGs is only 12% of the expected value. The specific star formation rate (sSFR= SFR/stellar mass) tends to be lower for galaxies with a higher \mhtwo\ or \mhi\ deficiency. This trend is not seen for the star formation efficiency (SFE=SFR/\mhtwo). We found tentative indications for an enhancement of \mhtwo\ in spiral galaxies in HCGs in an early evolutionary phase and a decrease in later phases. We suggest that this might be due to an enhancement of the conversion from atomic to molecular gas due to on-going tidal interactions in an early evolutionary phase, followed by HI stripping and a decrease of the molecular gas content because of lack of replenishment.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.