On the Minkowski distances and products of sum sets

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Abstract

Given two points p,qp,q in the real plane, the signed area of the rectangle with the diagonal [pq][pq] equals the square of the Minkowski distance between the points p,qp,q. We prove that N>1N>1 points in the Minkowski plane R1,1\R^{1,1} generate Ω(Nlog⁡N)Ω(\frac{N}{\log{N}}) distinct distances, or all the distances are zero. The proof follows the lines of the Elekes/Sharir/Guth/Katz approach to the Erd\H os distance problem, analysing the 3D incidence problem, arising by considering the action of the Minkowski isometry group ISO∗(1,1)ISO^*(1,1). The signature of the metric creates an obstacle to applying the Guth/Katz incidence theorem to the 3D problem at hand, since one may encounter a high count of congruent line intervals, lying on null lines, or "light cones", all these intervals having zero Minkowski length. In terms of the Guth/Katz theorem, its condition of the non-existence of "rich planes" generally gets violated. It turns out, however, that one can efficiently identify and discount incidences, corresponding to null intervals and devise a counting strategy, where the rich planes condition happens to be just ample enough for the strategy to succeed. As a corollary we establish the following near-optimal sum-product type estimate for finite sets A,B⊂RA,B\subset \R, with more than one element: ∣(A±B)⋅(A±B)∣≫∣A∣∣B∣log⁡∣A∣+log⁡∣B∣.|(A\pm{B})\cdot{(A\pm{B})}|\gg{\frac{|A||B|}{\log{|A|}+\log{|B|}}}.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.