Paper detail

On the minimum of independent collecting processes via the Stirling numbers of the second kind

We consider the combinatorial problem where $p$ players aim to a complete set of $N$ different types of items (species) which are uniformly distributed. Let the random variables $T_{N(i)},\,\,i=1,2,\cdots,p$ denoting the number of trials needed until all $N$ types are detected (at least once), respectively for each player. This paper studies the impact of the number $p$ in the asymptotics of the expectation, the second moment, and the variance of the random variable \begin{equation*} M_{N(p)}: = \bigwedge_{i=1}^p T_{N(i)},\,\,\,\,\,\,N\rightarrow \infty. \end{equation*} The main ingredient in the expression of these quantittes are sums involving the Stirling numbers of the second kind; for which the asymptotics are explored. At the end of the paper we conjecture on a remarkable \textit{combinatorial identity}, regarding alternating binomial sums. These sums have been studied (mainly) by P. Flajolet due to their applications to digital search trees and quadtrees.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.