Paper detail

On the metric dimension of line graphs

Let $G$ be a (di)graph. A set $W$ of vertices in $G$ is a \emph{resolving set} of $G$ if every vertex $u$ of $G$ is uniquely determined by its vector of distances to all the vertices in $W$. The \emph{metric dimension} $μ(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of all the resolving sets of $G$. Cáceres et al. \cite{Ca2} computed the metric dimension of the line graphs of complete bipartite graphs. Recently, Bailey and Cameron \cite{Ba} computed the metric dimension of the line graphs of complete graphs. In this paper we study the metric dimension of the line graph $L(G)$ of $G$. In particular, we show that $μ(L(G))=|E(G)|-|V(G)|$ for a strongly connected digraph $G$ except for directed cycles, where $V(G)$ is the vertex set and $E(G)$ is the edge set of $G$. As a corollary, the metric dimension of de Brujin digraphs and Kautz digraphs is given. Moreover, we prove that $\lceil\log_2Δ(G)\rceil\leqμ(L(G))\leq |V(G)|-2$ for a simple connected graph $G$ with at least five vertices, where $Δ(G)$ is the maximum degree of $G$. Finally, we obtain the metric dimension of the line graph of a tree in terms of its parameters.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.