Paper detail

On the maximum number of spanning copies of an orientation in a tournament

For an orientation $H$ with $n$ vertices, let $T(H)$ denote the maximum possible number of labeled copies of $H$ in an $n$-vertex tournament. It is easily seen that $T(H) \ge n!/2^{e(H)}$ as the latter is the expected number of such copies in a random tournament. For $n$ odd, let $R(H)$ denote the maximum possible number of labeled copies of $H$ in an $n$-vertex regular tournament. Adler et al. proved that, in fact, for $H=C_n$ the directed Hamilton cycle, $T(C_n) \ge (e-o(1))n!/2^{n}$ and it was observed by Alon that already $R(C_n) \ge (e-o(1))n!/2^{n}$. Similar results hold for the directed Hamilton path $P_n$. In other words, for the Hamilton path and cycle, the lower bound derived from the expectation argument can be improved by a constant factor. In this paper we significantly extend these results and prove that they hold for a larger family of orientations $H$ which includes all bounded degree Eulerian orientations and all bounded degree balanced orientations, as well as many others. One corollary of our method is that for any $k$-regular orientation $H$ with $n$ vertices, $T(H) \ge (e^k-o(1))n!/2^{e(H)}$ and in fact, for $n$ odd, $R(H) \ge (e^k-o(1))n!/2^{e(H)}$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.