Paper detail

On The Maximum Mass of Stellar Black Holes

We present the spectrum of compact object masses: neutron stars and black holes that originate from single stars in different environments. In particular, we calculate the dependence of maximum black hole mass on metallicity and on some specific wind mass loss rates (e.g., Hurley et al. and Vink et al.). Our calculations show that the highest mass black holes observed in the Galaxy M_bh = 15 Msun in the high metallicity environment (Z=Zsun=0.02) can be explained with stellar models and the wind mass loss rates adopted here. To reach this result we had to set Luminous Blue Variable mass loss rates at the level of about 0.0001 Msun/yr and to employ metallicity dependent Wolf-Rayet winds. With such winds, calibrated on Galactic black hole mass measurements, the maximum black hole mass obtained for moderate metallicity (Z=0.3 Zsun=0.006) is M_bh,max = 30 Msun. This is a rather striking finding as the mass of the most massive known stellar black hole is M_bh = 23-34 Msun and, in fact, it is located in a small star forming galaxy with moderate metallicity. We find that in the very low (globular cluster-like) metallicity environment the maximum black hole mass can be as high as M_bh,max = 80 Msun (Z=0.01 Zsun=0.0002). It is interesting to note that X-ray luminosity from Eddington limited accretion onto an 80 Msun black hole is of the order of about 10^40 erg/s and is comparable to luminosities of some known ULXs. We emphasize that our results were obtained for single stars only and that binary interactions may alter these maximum black hole masses (e.g., accretion from a close companion). This is strictly a proof-of-principle study which demonstrates that stellar models can naturally explain even the most massive known stellar black holes.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.