Paper detail

On the maximum fraction of edges covered by t perfect matchings in a cubic bridgeless graph

A conjecture of Berge and Fulkerson (1971) states that every cubic bridgeless graph contains 6 perfect matchings covering each edge precisely twice, which easily implies that every cubic bridgeless graph has three perfect matchings with empty intersection (this weaker statement was conjectured by Fan and Raspaud in 1994). Let $m_t$ be the supremum of all reals $α\le 1$ such that for every cubic bridgeless graph $G$, there exist $t$ perfect matchings of $G$ covering a fraction of at least $α$ of the edges of $G$. It is known that the Berge-Fulkerson conjecture is equivalent to the statement that $m_5=1$, and implies that $m_4=\tfrac{14}{15}$ and $m_3=\tfrac45$. In the first part of this paper, we show that $m_4=\tfrac{14}{15}$ implies $m_3=\tfrac45$, and $m_3=\tfrac45$ implies the Fan-Raspaud conjecture, strengthening a recent result of Tang, Zhang, and Zhu. In the second part of the paper, we prove that for any $2\le t \le 4$ and for any real $τ$ lying in some appropriate interval, deciding whether a fraction of more than (resp. at least) $τ$ of the edges of a given cubic bridgeless graph can be covered by $t$ perfect matching is an NP-complete problem. This resolves a conjecture of Tang, Zhang, and Zhu.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.