Paper detail

On the Maximum Entropy of a Sum of Independent Discrete Random Variables

Let $ X_1, \ldots, X_n $ be independent random variables taking values in the alphabet $ \{0, 1, \ldots, r\} $, and $ S_n = \sum_{i = 1}^n X_i $. The Shepp--Olkin theorem states that, in the binary case ($ r = 1 $), the Shannon entropy of $ S_n $ is maximized when all the $ X_i $'s are uniformly distributed, i.e., Bernoulli(1/2). In an attempt to generalize this theorem to arbitrary finite alphabets, we obtain a lower bound on the maximum entropy of $ S_n $ and prove that it is tight in several special cases. In addition to these special cases, an argument is presented supporting the conjecture that the bound represents the optimal value for all $ n, r $, i.e., that $ H(S_n) $ is maximized when $ X_1, \ldots, X_{n-1} $ are uniformly distributed over $ \{0, r\} $, while the probability mass function of $ X_n $ is a mixture (with explicitly defined non-zero weights) of the uniform distributions over $ \{0, r\} $ and $ \{1, \ldots, r-1\} $.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.