Paper detail

On the maximal cross number of unique factorization indexed multisets

In this paper, we study a conjecture of Gao and Wang concerning a proposed formula $K_1^*(G)$ for the maximal cross number $K_1(G)$ taken over all unique factorization indexed multisets over a given finite abelian group $G$. As a corollary of our first main result, we verify the conjecture for abelian groups of the form $C_{p^m}\oplus C_p, C_{p^m}\oplus C_q, C_{p^m}\oplus C_q^2$, $C_{p^m}\oplus C_r^n$ where $p,q$ are distinct primes and $r\in\{2,3\}$. In our second main result we verify that $K_1(G) = K_1^*(G)$ for groups of the form $C_r\oplus C_{p^m}\oplus C_p, C_{rp^mq}$ and $C_r\oplus C_p \oplus C_q^2$ for $r \in \{2,3\}$ given some restrictions on $p$ and $q$. We also study general techniques for computing and bounding $K_1(G)$, and derive an asymptotic result which shows that $K_1(G)$ becomes arbitrarily close to $K_1^*(G)$ as the smallest prime dividing $|G|$ goes to infinity, given certain conditions on the structure of $G$. We also derive some necessary properties of the structure of unique factorization indexed multisets which would hypothetically violate $k(S) \le K_1^*(G)$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.