Paper detail

On the Mathematics of Data Centre Network Topologies

The theory of combinatorial designs has recently been used in order to build switch-centric data centre networks incorporating a large number of servers, in comparison with the popular Fat-Tree data centre network. The construction employed, called the 3-step method, revolves around an appropriately chosen (but relatively small) bipartite graph and a transversal design. In this paper, we clarify and extend these recent results. In particular, we prove the following path diversity results: in a one-to-one context, we prove that in these data centre networks there are pairwise link-disjoint paths joining all the servers adjacent to some switch with all the servers adjacent to any other switch so that we retain control of the path lengths (these results are optimal in terms of the numbers of paths constructed and we prove that we have a wide choice of bipartite graph and transversal design to which we can apply the 3-step method); and in a one-to-many context, we prove that there are pairwise link-disjoint paths from all the servers adjacent to some switch to any identically-sized collection of target servers where these target servers need not be adjacent to the same switch (again, we keep control of the path lengths). Our constructions and analysis are undertaken on bipartite graphs with the applications to data centre networks being easily derived. Our results strengthen the overall competitiveness of data centre networks constructed using the 3-step method, in comparison with Fat-Tree data centre networks, and, more generally, show the potential of results and methodologies from combinatorics to data centre network design.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.