Paper detail

On the Mathematical Formulation of Radiance

Radiance is widely regarded as the principal quantity in light transport theory. Yet, the concept of radiance in use today has remained mostly unchanged since Lambert's work in the 18th century. His formulation of the measurement of light intensity is based on classical differentials, and is known to suffer from several theoretical and practical limitations. After tracing the historic development of radiance and its shortcomings, we provide a modern formulation of light intensity measurements that models radiance as a differential form. We demonstrate the utility of this use of exterior calculus for questions in light transport theory by rigorously deriving the cosine term and the area formulation, without the need for postulates or heuristic arguments. The formulation of radiance as a differential form introduced in this paper hence provides the first step towards a modern theory of light transport.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.