Paper detail

On the Masses of Galaxies in the Local Universe

We compare estimates of stellar mass, Mstar, and dynamical mass,Mdyn,for a sample of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). We assume dynamical homology (i.e., Mdyn = dispersion**2 * Reff, and we find a tight but strongly non-linear relation: the best fit relation is Mstar = Mdyn**0.73, with an observed scatter of 0.15 dex. We also find that, at fixed Mstar, the ratio Mstar/Mdyn depends strongly on galaxy structure, as parameterized by Sersic index, n. The size of the differential effect is on the order of 0.6 dex across 2 < n < 10. The apparent n-dependence of Mstar/Mdyn is similar to expectations from simple models, indicating that assuming homology gives the wrong dynamical mass. We have also derived dynamical mass estimates that explicitly account for differences in galaxies' profiles. Using this `structure-corrected' dynamical mass estimator, M(dyn,n), the best fit relation is Mstar = M(dyn,n)**(0.92 +- 0.08) with an observed scatter of 0.13 dex. While the data are thus consistent with a linear relation, they do prefer a slightly shallower slope. Further, we see only a small residual trend in Mstar/M(dyn,n) with n. We find no statistically significant systematic trends in Mstar/M(dyn,n) as a function of observed quantities (e.g, apparent magnitude, redshift), or as a function of tracers of stellar populations. The net differential bias in Mstar/M(dyn,n) across a wide range of stellar populations and star formation activities is <= 0.12 dex. The very good agreement between stellar mass and structure-corrected dynamical mass strongly suggests that: 1.) galaxy non-homology has a major impact on dynamical mass estimates, and 2. there are not strong systematic biases in the stellar mass-to-light ratios derived from broadband optical SEDs. Further, these results suggest that that the central dark-to-luminous mass ratio has a relatively weak mass dependence.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.