Paper detail

On the mass and the density of stellar disk of M33

The disk surface density of the nearby spiral galaxy M33 is estimated assuming that it is marginally stable against gravitational perturbations. For this purpose we used the radial profile of line-of-sight velocity dispersion of the disk planetary nebulae obtained by Ciardullo et al. (2004). The surface density profile we obtained is characterized by the radial scalelength which is close to the photometrical one and is in a good agreement with the rotation curve of M33 and with the mass-to-light ratio corresponding to the observed color indices. However at the galactocentric distance $r>7$ kpc the dynamical overheating of the disk remains quite possible. A thickness of the stellar disk of M33 should increase outwards. The dark halo mass exceeds the mass of the disk at $r>$ 7 kpc. The obtained radial profile of the disk surface density and the radial gradient of $O/H$ are used to calculate the effective oxygen yield $Y_{eff}$ in the frame of the instantaneous recycling approximation. It is shown that $Y_{eff}$ increases with radius which may indicate that the role of accretion of metal-poor gas in the chemical evolution of interstellar medium decreases outwards.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.