Paper detail

On the macroscopic verifications of Klein's theorem and the proof of $E_0=mc^2$

Alternative verifications of Klein's theorem and the proof of $E_0=mc^2$, for a relativistic macroscopic body are presented, using models with boundary conditions of varying complexity, together with some refinements for the case containing electromagnetic radiation for the simplest model. The robustness of these models to the final result of $E_0=mc^2$, attests to the minor role played by the Poincaré type stresses introduced in some of these models for mechanical stability. Finally we caution the reader that while internal consistency of the $E_0=mc^2$ relation for a macroscopic body in special relativity is proved, it does not in any way furnish a proof of the relation for a single point particle, for this would imply that one is able to prove the postulates of special relativity from the premises of the theory itself.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.