Paper detail

On the Macroscopic Fractal Geometry of Some Random Sets

This paper is concerned mainly with the macroscopic fractal behavior of various random sets that arise in modern and classical probability theory. Among other things, it is shown here that the macroscopic behavior of Boolean coverage processes is analogous to the microscopic structure of the Mandelbrot fractal percolation. Other, more technically challenging, results of this paper include: (i) The computation of the macroscopic dimension of the graph of a large family of Lévy processes; and (ii) The determination of the macroscopic monofractality of the extreme values of symmetric stable processes. As a consequence of (i), it will be shown that the macroscopic fractal dimension of the graph of Brownian motion differs from its microscopic fractal dimension. Thus, there can be no scaling argument that allows one to deduce the macroscopic geometry from the microscopic. Item (ii) extends the recent work of Khoshnevisan, Kim, and Xiao \cite{KKX} on the extreme values of Brownian motion, using a different method.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.