Paper detail

On the long nulls of PSRs J1738-2330 and J1752+2359

This paper compares and contrasts the emission of two high nulling fraction pulsars, PSRs J1738-2330 and J1752+2359. In both pulsars the emission bursts appear in a quasi-periodic fashion with typical separations of several hundred pulses, and in J1738-2330 there is evidence of two underlying periodicities with memory persisting for at least 11 bursts. By contrast, in J1752+2359 the pattern coherence is rapidly lost and the burst/null lengths appear to be selected randomly from their respective quasi-normal distributions. The typical emission bursts of J1738-2330 exhibit a steady exponential decay of on-pulse energy accompanied by a flickering emission characterized by short frequent nulls towards their end. In the bursts of J1752+2359 the flickering is absent, the decay more pronounced and the energy released during each bright phase is approximately constant. Unlike J1738-2330, the average profiles for the first and the last pulses of J1752+2359 bursts differ slightly from the pulsar's overall profile, hinting at differences between the two pulsars in their transitions from null to burst state (and vice-versa). During its long null phases, J1752+2359 is found to emit random weak inter-burst pulses (IBPs) whose profile peak is somewhat offset with respect to the overall average profile. Such pulses have no equivalent in J1738-2330 or in any known pulsar hitherto. They may pervade the entire emission of this pulsar and have a separate physical origin to normal pulses. On the basis of our comparison we conclude that a pulsar's nulling fraction, even when high, remains a poor guide to its detailed subpulse behaviour, as previously found for pulsars with small nulling fractions.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.