Paper detail

On the local Bump-Friedberg L-function

Let $F$ be a $p$-adic field. If $π$ be an irreducible representation of $GL(n,F)$, Bump and Friedberg associated to $π$ an Euler fator $L(π,BF,s_1,s_2)$ in \cite{BF}, that should be equal to $L(ϕ(π),s_1)L(ϕ(π),Λ^2,s_2)$, where $ϕ(π)$ is the Langlands' parameter of $π$. The main result of this paper is to show that this equality is true when $(s_1,s_2)=(s+1/2,2s)$, for $s$ in $\C$. To prove this, we classify in terms of distinguished discrete series, generic representations of $GL(n,F)$ which are $χ_α$-distinguished by the Levi subgroup $GL([(n+1)/2],F) \times GL([n/2],F)$, for $χ_α(g_1,g_2)=α(det(g_1)/det(g_2))$, where $α$ is a character of $F^*$ of real part between -1/2 and 1/2. We then adapt the technique of \cite{CP} to reduce the proof of the equality to the case of discrete series. The equality for discrete series is a consequence of the relation between linear periods and Shalika periods for discrete series, and the main result of \cite{KR}.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.