Paper detail

On the List-Decodability of Random Linear Codes

For every fixed finite field $\F_q$, $p \in (0,1-1/q)$ and $ε> 0$, we prove that with high probability a random subspace $C$ of $\F_q^n$ of dimension $(1-H_q(p)-ε)n$ has the property that every Hamming ball of radius $pn$ has at most $O(1/ε)$ codewords. This answers a basic open question concerning the list-decodability of linear codes, showing that a list size of $O(1/ε)$ suffices to have rate within $ε$ of the "capacity" $1-H_q(p)$. Our result matches up to constant factors the list-size achieved by general random codes, and gives an exponential improvement over the best previously known list-size bound of $q^{O(1/ε)}$. The main technical ingredient in our proof is a strong upper bound on the probability that $\ell$ random vectors chosen from a Hamming ball centered at the origin have too many (more than $Θ(\ell)$) vectors from their linear span also belong to the ball.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.