Paper detail

On the Link Between Energy Equipartition and Radial Variation in the Stellar Mass Function of Star Clusters

We make use of $N$-body simulations to determine the relationship between two observable parameters that are used to quantify mass segregation and energy equipartition in star clusters. Mass segregation can be quantified by measuring how the slope of a cluster's stellar mass function $α$ changes with clustercentric distance r, and then calculating $δ_α= \frac{d α(r)}{d ln(r/r_m)}$ where $r_m$ is the cluster's half-mass radius. The degree of energy equipartition in a cluster is quantified by $η$, which is a measure of how stellar velocity dispersion $σ$ depends on stellar mass m via $σ(m) \propto m^{-η}$. Through a suite of $N$-body star cluster simulations with a range of initial sizes, binary fractions, orbits, black hole retention fractions, and initial mass functions, we present the co-evolution of $δ_α$ and $η$. We find that measurements of the global $η$ are strongly affected by the radial dependence of $σ$ and mean stellar mass and the relationship between $η$ and $δ_α$ depends mainly on the cluster's initial conditions and the tidal field. Within $r_m$, where these effects are minimized, we find that $η$ and $δ_α$ initially share a linear relationship. However, once the degree of mass segregation increases such that the radial dependence of $σ$ and mean stellar mass become a factor within $r_m$, or the cluster undergoes core collapse, the relationship breaks down. We propose a method for determining $η$ within $r_m$ from an observational measurement of $δ_α$. In cases where $η$ and $δ_α$ can be measured independently, this new method offers a way of measuring the cluster's dynamical state.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.