Paper detail

On the linear evolution of disturbances in plane Poiseuille flow

The linear evolution of disturbances due to a ribbon vibrating at frequency $ω_0$ in plane Poiseuille flow is computed by solving the associated initial boundary value problem in the Fourier-Laplace plane, followed by inversion. A novel algorithm for identifying the temporal modes of the Orr-Sommerfeld equation (OSE) in the complex wavenumber plane, which are required in the inversion, is presented. Unlike in many prior studies, the performance of the Laplace integral first, not only avoids complicated causality arguments and confusion, in locating upstream and downstream modes, that is prevalent in literature but also yields a spatio-temporally uniform solution. It also reveals that the solution consists of a time-periodic part at $ω_0$ , associated with the relevant spatial mode (the Tollmein-Schlichting wave) and a transient wavepacket, associated mainly with the saddle points of the OSE and is computed by the method of steepest descents, which can also include contributions from the spatial pole. Which of these parts dominates depends on the Reynolds number and ω0. A secondary stability analysis of this dominant part is seen to explain the disturbance growth observed in the seminal experiments of Nishioka, Iida & Ichikawa (J. Fluid Mech., vol.72 , 1975, p.731) and Nishioka, Iida & Kanbayashi (NASA TM-75885, 1981). Threshold amplitudes for instability at a subcritical Reynolds number Re = 5000 are obtained from the time-averaged three dimensional disturbances, by combining the secondary base states and the growing Floquet modes. The observed minima of the threshold amplitude curves in the experiments are explained in terms of the instabilities of these two base states. Computations, for another subcritical (4000) and a supercritical (6000) Reynolds number, are also validated with the experimental data.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.