Paper detail

On the linear convergence of circumcentered isometry methods

The circumcentered Douglas--Rachford method (C--DRM), introduced by Behling, Bello Cruz and Santos, is an acceleration of the well-known Douglas-Rachford method (DRM) for finding the best approximation onto the intersection of finitely many affine subspaces. Inspired by the C--DRM, we introduced the more flexible circumcentered reflection method (CRM) and circumcentered isometry method (CIM). The CIM essentially chooses the closest point to the solution among all of the points in an associated affine hull as its iterate and is a generalization of the CRM. The circumcentered--reflection method introduced by Behling et al. to generalize the C--DRM is a special class of our CRM. We consider the CIM induced by a set of finitely many isometries for finding the best approximation onto the intersection of fixed point sets of the isometries which turns out to be an intersection of finitely many affine subspaces. We extend our previous linear convergence results on CRMs in finite-dimensional spaces from reflections to isometries. In order to better accelerate the symmetric method of alternating projections (MAP), the accelerated symmetric MAP first applies another operator to the initial point. (Similarly, to accelerate the DRM, the C--DRM first applies another operator to the initial point as well.) Motivated by these facts, we show results on the linear convergence of CIMs in Hilbert spaces with first applying another operator to the initial point. In particular, under some restrictions, our results imply that some CRMs attain the known linear convergence rate of the accelerated symmetric MAP in Hilbert spaces. We also exhibit a class of CRMs converging to the best approximation in Hilbert spaces with a convergence rate no worse than the sharp convergence rate of MAP. The fact that some CRMs attain the linear convergence rate of MAP or accelerated symmetric MAP is entirely new.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.