Paper detail

On the limit distribution of Frobenius numbers

The Frobenius number g(a) of an integer vector a with positive coprime coefficients is defined as the largest integer that does not have a representation as a non-negative integer linear combination of the coefficients of a. According to a recent result by Marklof, if a is taken to be random in an expanding d-dimensional domain D, then g(a) (appropriately rescaled) has a limit distribution. In the present paper we prove an asymptotic formula for the (algebraic) tail behavior of this limit distribution. We also prove that the corresponding upper bound on the probability of the Frobenius number being large holds uniformly with respect to the expansion factor of the domain D. Finally we prove that for large d, the limit distribution has almost all of its mass concentrated in a fairly short interval. The techniques involved in the proofs come from the geometry of numbers, and in particular we use results by Schmidt on the distribution of sublattices of Z^m, and bounds by Rogers and Schmidt on lattice coverings of space with convex bodies.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.