Paper detail

On the light-bending model of X-ray variability of MCG-6-30-15

We apply the light bending model of X-ray variability to Suzaku data of the Seyfert 1 galaxy MCG-6-30-15. We analyze the energy dependence of the root mean square (rms) variability, and discuss conditions necessary for the model to explain the characteristic decrease of the source variability around 5-8 keV. A model, where the X-ray source moves radially rather than vertically close to the disk surface, can indeed reproduce the reduced variability near the energy of the Fe Kalpha line, although the formal fit quality is poor. The model then predicts the energy spectra, which can be compared to observational data. The spectra are strongly reflection dominated, and do not provide a good fit to Suzaku spectral data of the source. The inconsistency of this result with some previous claims can be traced to our using data in a broader energy band, where effects of warm absorber in the spectrum cannot be neglected.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.