Paper detail

On the $L_2$ Markov Inequality with Laguerre Weight

Let $w_α(t)=t^α\,e^{-t}$, $α>-1$, be the Laguerre weight function, and $|\cdot|_{w_α}$ denote the associated $L_2$-norm, i.e., $$ | f|_{w_α}:=\Big(\int_{0}^{\infty}w_α(t)| f(t)|^2\,dt\Big)^{1/2}. $$ Denote by ${\cal P}_n$ the set of algebraic polynomials of degree not exceeding $n$. We study the best constant $c_n(α)$ in the Markov inequality in this norm, $$ | p^{\prime}|_{w_α}\leq c_n(α)\,| p|_{w_α}\,,\quad p\in {\cal P}_n\,, $$ namely the constant $$ c_{n}(α)=\sup_{\mathop{}^{p\in {\cal P}_n}_{p\ne 0}}\frac{| p^{\prime}|_{w_α}}{| p|_{w_α}}\,, $$ and we are also interested in its asymptotic value $$ c(α)=\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{c_{n}(α)}{n}\,. $$ In this paper we obtain lower and upper bounds for both $c_{n}(α)$ and $c(α)$. % Note that according to a result of P. Dörfler from 2002, $c(α)=[j_{(α-1)/2,1}]^{-1}$, with $j_{ν,1}$ being the first positive zero of the Bessel function $J_ν(z)$, hence our bounds for $c(α)$ imply bounds for $j_{(α-1)/2,1}$ as well.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.