Paper detail

On the Kolmogorov Constants for the Second-Order Structure Function and the Energy Spectrum

We examine the behavior of the Kolmogorov constants C_2, C_k, and C_{k1}, which are, respectively, the prefactors of the second order longitudinal structure function, the three dimensional and one-dimensional longitudinal energy spectrum in the inertial range. We show that their ratios, C_2/C_{k1} and C_k/C_{k1}, exhibit clear dependence on the micro-scale Reynolds number R_λ, implying that they cannot all be independent of R_λ. In particular, it is found that (C_{k1}/C_2-0.25) = 1.95R_λ^{-0.68}. The study further reveals that the widely-used relation C_2 = 4.02 C_{k1} holds only asymptotically when R_λ <= 10^5. It is also found that C_2 has much stronger R_λ-dependence than either C_k, or C_{k1} if the latter indeed has a systematic dependence on R_λ. We further show that the variable dependence on R_λ of these three numbers can be attributed to the difference of the inertial range in real- and wavenumber-space, with inertial range in real-space known to be much shorter than that in wavenumber space.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.