Paper detail

On the $k$-error linear complexity for $p^n$-periodic binary sequences via hypercube theory

The linear complexity and the $k$-error linear complexity of a binary sequence are important security measures for key stream strength. By studying binary sequences with the minimum Hamming weight, a new tool named as hypercube theory is developed for $p^n$-periodic binary sequences. In fact, hypercube theory is based on a typical sequence decomposition and it is a very important tool in investigating the critical error linear complexity spectrum proposed by Etzion et al. To demonstrate the importance of hypercube theory, we first give a standard hypercube decomposition based on a well-known algorithm for computing linear complexity and show that the linear complexity of the first hypercube in the decomposition is equal to the linear complexity of the original sequence. Second, based on such decomposition, we give a complete characterization for the first decrease of the linear complexity for a $p^n$-periodic binary sequence $s$. This significantly improves the current existing results in literature. As to the importance of the hypercube, we finally derive a counting formula for the $m$-hypercubes with the same linear complexity.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.