Paper detail

On the $k$-error linear complexity for $2^n$-periodic binary sequences via Cube Theory

The linear complexity and k-error linear complexity of a sequence have been used as important measures of keystream strength, hence designing a sequence with high linear complexity and $k$-error linear complexity is a popular research topic in cryptography. In this paper, the concept of stable $k$-error linear complexity is proposed to study sequences with stable and large $k$-error linear complexity. In order to study k-error linear complexity of binary sequences with period $2^n$, a new tool called cube theory is developed. By using the cube theory, one can easily construct sequences with the maximum stable $k$-error linear complexity. For such purpose, we first prove that a binary sequence with period $2^n$ can be decomposed into some disjoint cubes and further give a general decomposition approach. Second, it is proved that the maximum $k$-error linear complexity is $2^n-(2^l-1)$ over all $2^n$-periodic binary sequences, where $2^{l-1}\le k<2^{l}$. Thirdly, a characterization is presented about the $t$th ($t>1$) decrease in the $k$-error linear complexity for a $2^n$-periodic binary sequence $s$ and this is a continuation of Kurosawa et al. recent work for the first decrease of k-error linear complexity. Finally, A counting formula for $m$-cubes with the same linear complexity is derived, which is equivalent to the counting formula for $k$-error vectors. The counting formula of $2^n$-periodic binary sequences which can be decomposed into more than one cube is also investigated, which extends an important result by Etzion et al..

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.