Paper detail

On the interpretation of the He II absorption in the line of sight of Q0302-003

We point out the peculiarities of the line of sight of Q0302-003 which was recently used to estimate the He II opacity at $z \sim 3.285$. This line of sight contains a large void in Lyman $α$ clouds, in the region used for the He II opacity observation, and the void is thought to be caused by the ionizing radiation from a foreground quasar (Dobrzycki and Bechtold 1991). If this is true, then the radiation from the foreground quasar is more relevant in the region used for the estimation of the He II opacity than the diffuse UV background radiation. We argue that in that case the observed opacity should not be used to put constraint on the diffuse UV background radiation. Using a typical spectral index of quasars, we estimate that most of the observed He II opacity must be due to Gunn-Peterson effect and suggest a H I Gunn-Peterson test along this line of sight. We further discuss the clumpiness of the intergalactic medium in the vicinity of Q0302-003 as suggested by observations.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.