Paper detail

On the interplay between star formation and feedback in galaxy formation simulations

We investigate the star formation-feedback cycle in cosmological galaxy formation simulations, focusing on progenitors of Milky Way (MW)-sized galaxies. We find that in order to reproduce key properties of the MW progenitors, such as semi-empirically derived star formation histories and the shape of rotation curves, our implementation of star formation and stellar feedback requires 1) a combination of local early momentum feedback via radiation pressure and stellar winds and subsequent efficient supernovae feedback, and 2) efficacy of feedback that results in self-regulation of the global star formation rate on kiloparsec scales. We show that such feedback-driven self-regulation is achieved globally for a local star formation efficiency per free fall time of $ε_{\rm ff}\approx 10\%$. Although this value is larger that the $ε_{\rm ff}\sim 1\%$ value usually inferred from the Kennicutt-Schmidt (KS) relation, we show that it is consistent with direct observational estimates of $ε_{\rm ff}$ in molecular clouds. Moreover, we show that simulations with local efficiency of $ε_{\rm ff}\approx 10\%$ reproduce the global observed KS relation. Such simulations also reproduce the cosmic star formation history of the Milky Way sized galaxies and satisfy a number of other observational constraints. Conversely, we find that simulations that a priori assume an inefficient mode of star formation, instead of achieving it via stellar feedback regulation, fail to produce sufficiently vigorous outflows and do not reproduce observations. This illustrates the importance of understanding the complex interplay between star formation and feedback and the detailed processes that contribute to the feedback-regulated formation of galaxies.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.