Paper detail

On the injection of helicity by shearing motion of fluxes in relation to Flares and CMEs

An investigation of helicity injection by photospheric shear motions is carried out for two active regions(ARs), NOAA 11158 and 11166, using line-of-sight magnetic field observations obtained from the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager on-board Solar Dynamics Observatory. We derived the horizontal velocities in the active regions from the Differential Affine Velocity Estimator(DAVE) technique. Persistent strong shear motions at the maximum velocities in the range of 0.6--0.9km/s along the magnetic polarity inversion line and outward flows from the peripheral regions of the sunspots were observed in the two active regions. The helicities injected in NOAA 11158 and 11166 during their six days' evolution period were estimated as $14.16\times10^{42}$Mx$^2$ and $9.5\times10^{42}$Mx$^2$, respectively. The estimated injection rates decreased up to 13% by increasing the time interval between the magnetograms from 12 min to 36 min, and increased up to 9% by decreasing the DAVE window size from $21\times18$ to $9\times6$ pixel$^2$, resulting in 10% variation in the accumulated helicity. In both ARs, the flare prone regions (R2) had inhomogeneous helicity flux distribution with mixed helicities of both signs and that of CME prone regions had almost homogeneous distribution of helicity flux dominated by single sign. The temporal profiles of helicity injection showed impulsive variations during some flares/CMEs due to negative helicity injection into the dominant region of positive helicity flux. A quantitative analysis reveals a marginally significant association of helicity flux with CMEs but not flares in AR 11158, while for the AR 11166, we found marginally significant association of helicity flux with flares but not CMEs, providing evidences of the role of helicity injection at localized sites of the events.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.