Paper detail

On the Influence of ''Red Leak''of Light Filters on the Brightness Estimates of Stars of Late Spectral Types Illustrated by the Observations of Rapid Variability of Symbiotic Stars

The results of modeling the dependence of the red leak of photometric filters on various factors (color index V-R, luminosity class, interstellar reddening, airmass and PWV) during observations of stars are presented. The error arising from not taking into account the red leak in the case of filters used on the 0.6-m telescope of the CMO SAI can amount to 0.6-0.8 mag for late stars. Algorithms for reducing observational data are presented for filters U and B. The results of observations of the rapid variability of two symbiotic stars CH Cyg and SU Lyn with cold components of very late spectral types are presented. For CH Cyg, rapid variability was detected on both observation dates. Taking into account the red leak effect, the amplitude in the B band was 0.10 mag on November 6, 2019 and 0.19 mag on December 15, 2022, with a characteristic variability time of about 20 minutes. For SU Lyn, no rapid brightness variability was detected in the B band on February 2, 2023 (with an accuracy of 0.003 mag).

preprint2024arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.