Paper detail

On the Independence of Fundamental Decompositions of Power-Law Kinetic Systems

The fundamental decomposition of a chemical reaction network (CRN) is induced by partitioning the reaction set into "fundamental classes". It was the basis of the Higher Deficiency Algorithm for mass action systems of Ji and Feinberg, and the Multistationarity Algorithm for power-law kinetic systems of Hernandez et al. In addition to our previous work, we provide important properties of the independence (i.e., the network's stoichiometric subspace is the direct sum of the subnetworks' stoichiometric subspaces) and the incidence-independence (i.e., the image of the network's incidence map is the direct sum of the incidence maps' images of the subnetworks) of these decompositions. Feinberg established the essential relationship between independent decompositions and the set of positive equilibria of a network, which we call the Feinberg Decomposition Theorem (FDT). Moreover, Farinas et al. recently documented its version for incidence-independence. Fundamental decomposition divides the network into subnetworks of deficiency either 0 or 1 only. Hence, available results for lower deficiency networks, such as the Deficiency Zero Theorem (DZT), can be used. These justify the study of independent fundamental decompositions. A MATLAB program which (i) computes the subnetworks of a CRN under the fundamental decomposition and (ii) is useful for determining whether the decomposition is independent and incidence-independent is also created. Finally, we provide the following solution for determining multistationarity of CRNs with the following steps: (1) the use of the program, (2) the application of available results for CRNs with deficiency 0 or 1 (e.g., DZT), and (3) the use of FDT. We illustrate the solution by showing that the generalization of a subnetwork of Schmitz's carbon cycle model by Hernandez et al., endowed with mass action kinetics, has no capacity for multistationarity.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.