Paper detail

On the inclinations of the Jupiter Trojans

Jupiter Trojans are are characterized by dark photometric colors, high inclinations and an asymmetry in number of bodies between the two swarms. Different models have been proposed to explain the high inclination of the Trojans and to interpret their relation with the TNOs, but none of them can also satisfactorily explain the asymmetry ratio. Recently it has been found that the asymmetry can arise if Jupiter has migrated inwards by at least a few au during its growth. The asymmetry and the dark colors of the Trojans are natural outcomes of this model, but simulations with massless unperturbed disc particles led to a flat distribution of the Trojan inclinations and a final total mass that was 3-4 orders of magnitude larger than the current one. In our work, we investigate the possible origin of the peculiar inclination distribution of the Trojans in the scenario where Jupiter migrates inwards. We analyze different possibilities: (a) the secular evolution of an initially flat Trojan population, (b) the presence of planetary embryos among the Trojans and (c) capture of the Trojans from a pre-stirred planetesimal population. We find that the secular evolution of the Trojans and Saturn do not affect the Trojan inclinations appreciably, nor is there any significant mass depletion. Embryos embedded in the swarms, in contrast, can stir the Trojan inclinations and can also deplete the swarms efficiently, but it turns out that it is very difficult to get rid of all of the massive bodies. We propose that the disc where Jupiter's core was forming was already excited by the presence of other embryos competing in Jupiter's core's feeding zone. We show that the trapped Trojans preserve their high inclination through the gas phase of the disc and that Saturn's perturbations are more effective on highly inclined Trojans, leading to a lower capture efficiency and to a substantial depletion of the swarms.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.