Paper detail

On the importance of special relativistic effects in modelling ultra-fast outflows

Outflows are observed in a variety of astrophysical sources. Remarkably, ultra-fast ($v\geq 0.1c$), outflows in the UV and X-ray bands are often seen in AGNs. Depending on their energy and mass outflow rate, respectively $\dot{E}_{out}, \dot{M}_{out}$, such outflows may play a key role in regulating the AGN-host galaxy co-evolution process through cosmic time. It is therefore crucial to provide accurate estimates of the wind properties. Here, we concentrate on special relativistic effects concerning the interaction of light with matter moving at relativistic speed relatively to the source of radiation. Our aim is to assess the impact of these effects on the observed properties of the outflows and implement a relativistic correction in the existing spectral modelling routines. We define a simple procedure to incorporate relativistic effects in radiative transfer codes. Following this procedure, we run a series of simulations to explore the impact of these effects on the simulated spectra, for different $v$ and column densities of the outflow. The observed optical depth is usually considered a proxy for the wind $N_H$, independently on its velocity. However, our simulations show that the observed optical depth of an outflow with a given column density $N_H$ decreases rapidly as the velocity of the wind approaches relativistic values. This, in turn, implies that when estimating $N_H$ from the optical depth, it is necessary to include a velocity-dependent correction, already for moderate velocities (e.g. $v \geq 0.05c$). This correction linearly propagates to the derived $\dot{M}_{out}, \dot{E}_{out}$. As an example of these effects, we calculate the relativistically corrected values of $\dot{M}_{out}$ and $\dot{E}_{out}$ for a sample of $\sim 30$ Ultra-Fast Outflows taken from the literature, and find correction factors of $20-120 \%$ within the observed range of outflowing velocities.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.