Paper detail

On the importance of scattering at 8 microns: Brighter than you think

Context. Extinction and emission of dust models need for observational constraints to be validated. The coreshine phenomenon has already shown the importance of scattering in the 3 to 5 micron range and its ability to validate dust properties for dense cores. Aims. We want to investigate whether scattering can also play a role at longer wavelengths and to place even tighter constraints on the dust properties. Methods. We analyze the inversion of the Spitzer 8 micron map of the dense molecular cloud L183, to examine the importance of scattering as a potential contributor to the line-of-sight extinction. Results. The column density deduced from the inversion of the 8 micron map, when we neglect scattering, disagrees with all the other column density measurements of the same region. Modeling confirms that scattering at 8 microns is not negligible with an intensity of several hundred kJy per sr. This demonstrates the need of efficiently scattering dust grains at MIR wavelengths up to 8 microns. Coagulated aggregates are good candidates and might also explain the discrepancy at high extinction between E(J-K) et tau(9.7) toward dense molecular clouds. Further investigation requires considering efficiently scattering dust grains including ices as realistic dust models.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.