Paper detail

On the impact of relativistic gravity on the rate of tidal disruption events

The tidal disruption of stars by supermassive black holes (SMBHs) probes relativistic gravity. In the coming decade, the number of observed tidal disruption events (TDEs) will grow by several orders of magnitude, allowing statistical inferences of the properties of the SMBH and stellar populations. Here we analyse the probability distribution functions of the pericentre distances of stars that encounter an SMBH in the Schwarzschild geometry, where the results are completely analytic, and the Kerr metric. From this analysis we calculate the number of observable TDEs, defined to be those that come within the tidal radius $r_{\rm t}$ but outside the direct capture radius (which is, in general, larger than the horizon radius). We find that relativistic effects result in a steep decline in the number of stars that have pericenter distances $r_{\rm p} \lesssim 10\,r_{\rm g}$, where $r_{\rm g} = GM/c^2$, and that for maximally spinning SMBHs the distribution function of $r_{\rm p}$ at such distances scales as $f_{\rm r_{\rm p}}\propto r_{\rm p}^{4/3}$, or in terms of $β\equiv r_{\rm t}/r_{\rm p}$ scales as $f_β \propto β^{-10/3}$. We find that spin has little effect on the TDE fraction until the very high-mass end, where instead of being identically zero the rate is small ($\lesssim 1\%$ of the expected rate in the absence of relativistic effects). Effectively independent of spin, if the progenitors of TDEs reflect the predominantly low-mass stellar population and thus have masses $\lesssim 1M_{\odot}$, we expect a substantial reduction in the rate of TDEs above $10^{7}M_{\odot}$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.