Paper detail

On the Impact of Network Delays on Time-to-Live Caching

We consider Time-to-Live (TTL) caches that tag every object in cache with a specific (and possibly renewable) expiration time. State-of-the-art models for TTL caches assume zero object fetch delay, i.e., the time required to fetch a requested object that is not in cache from a different cache or the origin server. Particularly, in cache hierarchies, this delay has a significant impact on performance metrics such as the object hit probability. Recent work suggests that the impact of the object fetch delay on the cache performance will continue to increase due to the scaling mismatch between shrinking inter-request times (due to higher data center link rates) in contrast to processing and memory access times. In this paper, we analyze tree-based cache hierarchies with random object fetch delays and provide an exact analysis of the corresponding object hit probability. Our analysis allows understanding the impact of random delays and TTLs on cache metrics for a wide class of request stream models characterized through Markov arrival processes. This is expressed through a metric that we denote delay impairment of the hit probability. In addition, we analyze and extend state-of-the-art approximations of the hit probability to take the delay into account. We provide numerical and trace-based simulation-based evaluation results showing that larger TTLs do not efficiently compensate for the detrimental effect of object fetch delays. Our evaluations also show that unlike our exact model the state-of-the-art approximations do not capture the impact of the object fetch delay well especially for cache hierarchies. Surprisingly, we show that the impact of this delay on the hit probability is not monotonic but depends on the request stream properties, as well as, the TTL.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.